Update and add index

This commit is contained in:
Jonas Zeunert
2024-04-23 15:17:38 +02:00
parent 4d0cd768f7
commit 8d4db5d359
726 changed files with 41721 additions and 53949 deletions

View File

@@ -4089,6 +4089,65 @@ education.</p></li>
<h4 id="democratization-of-science">Democratization of Science</h4>
<ul>
<li><p><a
href="https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.1250475">Reproducibility</a>
- <strong><em>Science</em></strong>, 2014. [<a
href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=676974831306442279&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=0,10">All
Versions</a>].</p></li>
<li><p><a
href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41557-024-01470-8">Bridging the
information gap in organic chemical reactions</a> - <strong><em>Nature
Chemistry</em></strong>, 2024. [<a
href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=5365091261196953334">All
Versions</a>]. This perspective article formulates eight principles to
improve data management in scientific publications relating to data
standardization, reproducibility and evaluation, and encourage
scientists to go beyond current publication standards.</p></li>
<li><p><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-016-0021">A
manifesto for reproducible science</a> - <strong><em>Nature Human
Behavior</em></strong>, 2017. [<a
href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=9515807942859203900&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=0,10">All
Versions</a>].</p></li>
<li><p><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/533452a">1,500
scientists lift the lid on reproducibility</a> -
<strong><em>Nature</em></strong>, 2016. [<a
href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=11479406257389837824&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=0,5">All
Versions</a>].</p></li>
<li><p><a
href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4204808/">How to Make
More Published Research True</a> - <strong><em>PLoS
Medicine</em></strong>, 2014. [<a
href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=10945341175996677908">All
Versions</a>].</p></li>
<li><p><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d42473-019-00004-y">Six
factors affecting reproducibility in life science research and how to
handle them</a> - <strong><em>Nature
Advertisement</em></strong>.</p></li>
<li><p><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02428-3">Five
keys to writing a reproducible lab protocol</a> -
<strong><em>Nature</em></strong>, 2021. [<a
href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=13259206850261301938">All
Versions</a>]. This interviewing paper introduces five ways to increase
the reproducibility of experimental protocols: (i) documenting protocols
as the experiment goes; (ii) providing video illustrations in addition
to written protocols; (iii) using electronic lab notebooks (ELNs) for
managing experimental resources digitally; (iv) depositing and
documenting reagents with understanding the rationale behind every step;
and (v) exploiting online platforms to share tips, extensions, methods,
and data among researchers.</p></li>
<li><p><a
href="https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2003779">The
Experimental Design Assistant</a> - <strong><em>PLoS
Biology</em></strong>, 2017. [<a
href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=12481490526120919925">All
Versions</a>]. [<a
href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.4462">Nature Methods
Correspondence</a>]. [<a href="https://eda.nc3rs.org.uk/">EDA
Website</a>]. The EDA is a web-based tool that guides the in vivo
researcher through the experimental design and analysis process,
providing automated feedback on the proposed design and generating a
graphical summary that aids communication with colleagues, funders,
regulatory authorities, and the wider scientific community.</p></li>
<li><p><a
href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06221-2">Scientific
discovery in the age of artificial intelligence</a> -
<strong><em>Nature</em></strong>, 2023. [<a
@@ -4161,56 +4220,6 @@ href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=8711939262720486725&amp;hl=en&a
Versions</a>]. [<a
href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.05376">Preprint</a>].</p></li>
<li><p><a
href="https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.1250475">Reproducibility</a>
- <strong><em>Science</em></strong>, 2014. [<a
href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=676974831306442279&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=0,10">All
Versions</a>].</p></li>
<li><p><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-016-0021">A
manifesto for reproducible science</a> - <strong><em>Nature Human
Behavior</em></strong>, 2017. [<a
href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=9515807942859203900&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=0,10">All
Versions</a>].</p></li>
<li><p><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/533452a">1,500
scientists lift the lid on reproducibility</a> -
<strong><em>Nature</em></strong>, 2016. [<a
href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=11479406257389837824&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=0,5">All
Versions</a>].</p></li>
<li><p><a
href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4204808/">How to Make
More Published Research True</a> - <strong><em>PLoS
Medicine</em></strong>, 2014. [<a
href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=10945341175996677908">All
Versions</a>].</p></li>
<li><p><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d42473-019-00004-y">Six
factors affecting reproducibility in life science research and how to
handle them</a> - <strong><em>Nature
Advertisement</em></strong>.</p></li>
<li><p><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02428-3">Five
keys to writing a reproducible lab protocol</a> -
<strong><em>Nature</em></strong>, 2021. [<a
href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=13259206850261301938">All
Versions</a>]. This interviewing paper introduces five ways to increase
the reproducibility of experimental protocols: (i) documenting protocols
as the experiment goes; (ii) providing video illustrations in addition
to written protocols; (iii) using electronic lab notebooks (ELNs) for
managing experimental resources digitally; (iv) depositing and
documenting reagents with understanding the rationale behind every step;
and (v) exploiting online platforms to share tips, extensions, methods,
and data among researchers.</p></li>
<li><p><a
href="https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2003779">The
Experimental Design Assistant</a> - <strong><em>PLoS
Biology</em></strong>, 2017. [<a
href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=12481490526120919925">All
Versions</a>]. [<a
href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.4462">Nature Methods
Correspondence</a>]. [<a href="https://eda.nc3rs.org.uk/">EDA
Website</a>]. The EDA is a web-based tool that guides the in vivo
researcher through the experimental design and analysis process,
providing automated feedback on the proposed design and generating a
graphical summary that aids communication with colleagues, funders,
regulatory authorities, and the wider scientific community.</p></li>
<li><p><a
href="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10059206">Optimizing
Spaced Repetition Schedule by Capturing the Dynamics of Memory</a> -
<strong><em>IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data
@@ -4411,6 +4420,16 @@ Versions</a>]. The emergence of connected instruments and equipment
promises to untether researchers from the laboratory — letting them
fine-tune experiments and analyse data remotely.</p></li>
<li><p><a
href="https://www.cell.com/trends/chemistry/fulltext/S2589-5974(23)00249-6">Balancing
act: when to flex and when to stay fixed</a> - <strong><em>Trends in
Chemistry</em></strong>, 2023. [<a
href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=14208571639305934551">All
Versions</a>]. This perspective article provides essential insights into
the decision-making process for choosing automation platforms,
highlighting the suitability of fixed automation for standardized tasks
and the strategic use of flexible automation in dynamic research
settings.</p></li>
<li><p><a
href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590238522006385">What
is a minimal working example for a self-driving laboratory?</a> -
<strong><em>Matter</em></strong>, 2022. [<a